WG15 Defect Report Ref: 9945-2-48
Topic: shell parameter expansion


This is an approved interpretation of 9945-2:1993.

.

Last update: 1997-05-20


								9945-2-48

 _____________________________________________________________________________


	Topic:			shell parameter expansion
	Relevant Sections:	Table E-1
	Classification:	defect


Defect Report:
-----------------------

	Please can you indicate whether an error (typographical or otherwise)
	has been made in Table E-1 (Volume II, lines 3273-3291 of Annex E)
	of ISO/IEC 9945-2:1993.

	Table E-1 seeks to clarify all possible combinations that arise
	from shell parameter expansions, as described in section 3.6.2
	of Volume I, lines 399-420. However, if lines 399-417 are read
	while ignoring the phrase "or null" (as lines 418-420 imply), the
	resultant table obtained differs from Table E-1 in the following
	places:

	- lines 3282,3283; column "parameter set but null":
		currently: "substitute parameter"
		should be: "substitute null"
	Rationale: the ultimate effect of the operation is the same,
	since the set parameter has the null value already; however,
	the proposed change makes this entry more consistent with
	similar entries of the same column at lines 3278-3279 and 3286-3287.

	- lines 3283,3283; column "parameter unset":
		currently: "assign null"
		should be: "assign word"
	Rationale: the indicated correction is a direct result of 
	reading section 3.6.2, lines 402-404 while ignoring the phrase
	"or null".

	It is agreed (lines 3268-3269 of Annex E) that historically
	this section of documentation has been "hard to understand".
	The above corrections (if adopted) will help to overcome this
	difficulty, but the present text only serves to compound the
	dilemna.

(Mr.D.R.Killick)


WG15 response for 9945-2:1993 
-----------------------------------
The rationale is in error.
Concerns about the wording of this part of the rationale for the
standard have been forwarded to the sponsor.
   

Rationale for Interpretation:
-----------------------------
Where there is a conflict between the standard and the rationale, the
standard takes precedence.

It is expected that a future revison of the standard will address
this issue.


 _____________________________________________________________________________