.
Last update: 1997-05-20
9945-2-138
_____________________________________________________________________________
Topic: regex
Relevant Sections: Annex B, Section B.5
Defect Report:
-----------------------
From: [email protected] (Mark Funkenhauser)
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 1995 10:04:58 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: ISO/IEC 9945-2:1993
Dear Standards Board,
I would like to an request official, binding interpretation
from WG15 concerning the wording in 9945-2:1993 Annex B
section B.5 C Binding for RE matching.
Table B-10 - regcomp(), regexec() Return Values (line 424) says:
REG_BADRPT ?, *, or + not preceded by valid RE
Was is it intentional to omit '{' from this error message?
The Error Code, meaning "bad repeater" implies that it is to used as a
Error Code and Description when a repeater is not preceded by a valid
regular expression. "{m,n}" is a repeat construct that can be preceded by
an invalid RE. While REG_BADPAT is an Error Code that will cover this
situation it is vague and not as useful as the return of REG_BADRPT.
Currently the description of REG_BADRPT is confusing to users who read it
when the error to be indicated is applicable to an interval expression
repeater (particularly if the RE does contain other types of repeaters).
A proposed solution is that line 424 be changed to read:
REG_BADRPT ?, *, +, or { not preceded by valid RE
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Interpretation response
------------------------
The standard clearly states the requirements for return values
for regcomp(), regexec() and conforming implementations must conform to this.
However concerns have been raised about this which are
being referred to the sponsor. We are concerned not only about
{ in EREs but \{ in BREs.
Rationale
-------------
None.
Forwarded to Interpretations group: Aug 16 1995
Recirculated for 30 day review: Oct 19 1995
Finalised: Nov 20 1995